Human Touch Super Novo vs Super Novo 2.0: What’s Changed & Which One Should You Buy?

The Human Touch Super Novo has long been one of the most recognizable premium massage chairs on the market. When the Super Novo 2.0 was released, many buyers assumed it was a major overhaul — but the reality is more nuanced.

This comparison breaks down what actually changed, what stayed the same, and which model makes more sense depending on how you plan to use your massage chair.

Quick Answer

Choose the Super Novo 2.0 if you want refined software, smoother operation, and updated usability.
Choose the original Super Novo if you want the same core massage performance at a better value.

The massage experience itself is more similar than most people expect.

What the Super Novo and Super Novo 2.0 Have in Common

Both models share the same core DNA, which is why they feel familiar to longtime Human Touch fans.

Shared Features

• SL-Track massage coverage (neck to glutes)

• 3D massage rollers

• Full-body air compression

• Zero-gravity positioning

• Lumbar and calf heat

• Body scanning for personalized fit

• Large touchscreen tablet interface

If you’ve used one, you’ll recognize the other immediately.

What’s Actually Different in the Super Novo 2.0

The biggest changes are about refinement, not reinvention.

1️⃣ Updated Software & Interface

The Super Novo 2.0 offers:

• Smoother menu navigation

• Improved program transitions

• Better responsiveness from the touchscreen

It feels more polished, especially for daily use.

2️⃣ Program Adjustments

Massage programs in the 2.0 are:

• Slightly rebalanced

• Less abrupt in pressure changes

• More fluid in movement patterns

This is subtle — but noticeable for frequent users.

3️⃣ Overall User Experience

The 2.0 focuses on:

• Reduced mechanical noise

• Smoother roller motion

• More intuitive customization

Think of it as a “luxury refinement” rather than a new massage style.

What Did NOT Change (Important)

Despite marketing language, these aspects are essentially the same:

• Massage track length

• Roller reach and depth capability

• Core massage strength

• Heat placement

• Chair size and footprint

This is why many value-focused buyers still choose the original Super Novo.

Which One Feels Better?

This depends on what you prioritize.

Super Novo (Original)

Best for:

• Buyers who want strong massage performance

• Shoppers focused on value

• People upgrading from mid-range chairs

• Users who don’t need the latest interface refinements

Massage feel: Powerful, consistent, premium

Super Novo 2.0

Best for:

• Daily users

• Buyers who value smooth transitions and polish

• Those sensitive to abrupt pressure changes

• People who want the most refined Human Touch experience

Massage feel: Smoother, more refined, more “luxury”

Price vs Value Considerations

The Super Novo 2.0 typically commands a higher price due to:

• Updated software

• Refined experience

• Newer production cycle

However, if pricing is a major factor, the original Super Novo often delivers nearly identical massage performance at a better value — especially in certified pre-owned or floor model options.

Who Should Skip Both?

Neither model may be ideal if you:

• Prefer very aggressive deep-tissue massage

• Want 4D roller speed variation

• Need a compact chair for small spaces

• Are extremely sensitive to heat or pressure

In those cases, other chair styles may be a better fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Super Novo 2.0 worth upgrading from the original?
If you already own a Super Novo, the upgrade is usually not necessary unless you strongly value interface improvements.

Is massage strength stronger in the 2.0?
No — strength is comparable. The difference is smoothness, not power.

Do both chairs fit tall users?
Yes, both accommodate a wide height range, but fit should always be confirmed.

Final Verdict

If you want the most refined Human Touch experience, choose the Super Novo 2.0.
If you want the same core massage performance at a better value, the original Super Novo remains an excellent choice.

This is a rare case where “newer” doesn’t automatically mean “better for everyone.”